Updated May 30, 2026 · Materials testing · Fundamentals

Hardness testing – overview of Brinell, Vickers and Rockwell

Hardness testing is an established tool for the mechanical characterisation of materials such as steels, aluminium and titanium alloys, plastics, ceramics or mineral materials. It introduces localised indentations into the material. Depending on the method, indentation sizes range from a few micrometres to several millimetres. Typical applications are incoming and outgoing goods inspection, process and intermediate checks, hardness profile measurements or failure analysis in laboratories – especially when fast comparative data are needed before deeper tensile or indentation-based analysis.

Get in touch
Comparison of hardness indentations: Brinell ball, Vickers pyramid, Rockwell depth measurement
Fig. – Vickers indentation

What is hardness testing and what is it used for?

Hardness is the resistance of a material to the penetration of a harder indenter. Depending on the standard method, hardness is calculated from an indentation area (measured optically), an indentation diagonal (measured optically) or a penetration depth (distance measured between minor and major load). Hardness values often correlate with strength properties, which is why standardised conversions exist. However, conversions depend on material and condition and do not replace direct strength testing.

Which applications require hardness testing?

  • Incoming and in-process inspection in aerospace, automotive and medical engineering.
  • Testing of heat treatments, coatings and surface layers (especially Vickers).
  • Hardness profile measurements (Vickers at defined step distances).
  • Failure analysis and microstructural assessment (revealing local differences).

How do the hardness testing methods work in detail?

Brinell hardness testing (DIN EN ISO 6506-1)

A hard-metal ball (HBW) is pressed into the prepared surface with a defined test force F. After unloading, two indentation diameters d at right angles are measured optically. The Brinell hardness HBW is calculated from this. Large ball diameters and test forces are suitable for coarse-grained microstructures; very high-strength materials are less suitable. The correct choice of ball diameter and test force ensures that the rim of the indentation neither piles up excessively (force too high) nor becomes ill-defined (force too low).

Vickers hardness testing (DIN EN ISO 6507-1)

A diamond pyramid (face angle 136°) produces a permanent indentation. The two diagonals are measured and the Vickers hardness HV is derived from them. The advantage: a wide force range down to the micro-load range (e.g. HV0.01) enables fine hardness profiles, surface layers and small components to be characterised. This requires appropriate surface preparation and reliable optical evaluation.

Rockwell hardness testing (DIN EN ISO 6508-1)

In Rockwell testing (e.g. HRC), the penetration depth of an indenter between minor and major load is measured. For HRC a diamond cone (120°) with a rounded tip is used. The method is robust, fast and well suited for automated serial testing. For very thin layers and very small spacing between indentations, Rockwell is less suitable than Vickers.

How are hardness values written correctly?

  • HBW 2.5/187.5/10 – Brinell with ball Ø 2.5 mm, test force 187.5 kgf, dwell time 10 s.
  • HV 30/10 – Vickers hardness with 30 kgf (≈ 294 N) and 10 s.
  • HRC 62 – Rockwell hardness on the C scale (diamond cone), dimensionless.

Units: Brinell and Vickers are historically given without units (HBW, HV), but they are based on force/area relationships. Rockwell is a scale-specific number (HRA/HRB/HRC …).

Which method should I choose?

Criterion Brinell Vickers Rockwell
Microstructure / large areas Advantage with coarse microstructures, large indentations Good for fine details & profiles Robust, fast, close to production
Small spacing / thin layers Limited Very good (micro / low load) Rather limited
Optical vs. depth measurement Optical Optical Depth measurement
Automation Feasible Feasible Very good

For serial testing with high throughput, Rockwell is popular; for fine microstructural differences and layer characterisation, Vickers offers the highest resolution. Brinell is particularly informative for coarse-grained or heterogeneous materials with sufficient thickness.

Which standards and conversion rules apply to hardness testing?

Brinell: DIN EN ISO 6506-1, Vickers: DIN EN ISO 6507-1, Rockwell: DIN EN ISO 6508-1. DIN EN ISO 18265 can be used for the conversion between hardness and tensile properties. Conversions are only valid within certain limits and depend on material and condition – for direct strength values, a tensile test or the Imprint Test (indentation plastometry) without conversion is preferable.

Which questions are frequently asked about hardness testing?

How should I prepare the surface?

A sufficiently smooth, flat and clean surface is essential – especially for optical methods (HBW, HV). Grinding marks, scale or coating residues can distort the measurement results.

How do I document results correctly?

Always record the complete notation (e.g. HV 5/10), including test force and dwell time; for Brinell, also record the ball diameter.

When is a conversion useful?

Conversions (e.g. according to DIN EN ISO 18265) are approximations. For different materials, microstructural conditions or demanding accuracy, you should use direct strength tests or the Imprint Test.

Authors · Contributors

Testawell editorial team, Peter Zok

Peter Zok

Peter Zok

Applications – Materials Testing

Testawell

15 years of experience in materials testing.

View profile →